🔗 Share this article

Internationally, nations are pouring enormous sums into the concept of “sovereign AI” – building national artificial intelligence technologies. Starting with Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are vying to create AI that comprehends local languages and local customs.

The Global AI Competition

This movement is an element in a wider worldwide competition led by major corporations from the US and the People's Republic of China. Whereas firms like a leading AI firm and Meta pour massive capital, middle powers are also taking sovereign gambles in the AI field.

Yet with such vast amounts in play, is it possible for less wealthy countries attain meaningful advantages? According to a specialist from an influential research institute, “Unless you’re a affluent nation or a major firm, it’s a substantial burden to build an LLM from nothing.”

Security Considerations

Many countries are unwilling to depend on external AI models. Across India, for example, American-made AI solutions have sometimes proven inadequate. An illustrative example involved an AI tool deployed to educate pupils in a distant area – it spoke in the English language with a thick American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional students.

Additionally there’s the national security factor. For India’s security agencies, relying on certain external AI tools is seen as not permissible. As one developer explained, It's possible it contains some arbitrary data source that may state that, for example, Ladakh is outside of India … Using that particular system in a security environment is a big no-no.”

He further stated, I’ve consulted people who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, forget about certain models, they prefer not to rely on Western platforms because details may be transferred outside the country, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

Domestic Initiatives

As a result, some states are supporting national ventures. An example such initiative is being developed in India, in which a company is striving to develop a sovereign LLM with government backing. This effort has allocated roughly 1.25 billion dollars to artificial intelligence advancement.

The founder imagines a AI that is less resource-intensive than premier models from Western and Eastern tech companies. He notes that India will have to compensate for the funding gap with expertise. Based in India, we don’t have the option of investing billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we contend versus for example the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the United States is pumping in? I think that is where the core expertise and the brain game is essential.”

Native Priority

Across Singapore, a government initiative is supporting language models developed in local native tongues. Such languages – including Malay, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, the Khmer language and others – are often inadequately covered in US and Chinese LLMs.

I wish the people who are developing these national AI models were aware of just how far and just how fast the frontier is progressing.

An executive engaged in the project notes that these models are created to enhance bigger systems, as opposed to displacing them. Systems such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he says, commonly have difficulty with regional languages and culture – communicating in unnatural Khmer, for example, or suggesting pork-based dishes to Malaysian users.

Developing native-tongue LLMs allows national authorities to include local context – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful tool created elsewhere.

He continues, I am cautious with the concept independent. I think what we’re attempting to express is we want to be better represented and we wish to comprehend the abilities” of AI technologies.

Multinational Cooperation

Regarding nations attempting to establish a position in an intensifying international arena, there’s an alternative: join forces. Analysts affiliated with a prominent policy school have suggested a state-owned AI venture shared among a group of developing nations.

They term the initiative “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, drawing inspiration from the European successful play to build a competitor to Boeing in the mid-20th century. The plan would involve the formation of a government-supported AI organization that would combine the capabilities of several nations’ AI programs – for example the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and Sweden – to develop a competitive rival to the US and Chinese giants.

The lead author of a study outlining the initiative says that the concept has gained the attention of AI ministers of at least a few nations up to now, along with multiple sovereign AI firms. While it is presently focused on “mid-sized nations”, emerging economies – Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have additionally shown curiosity.

He explains, In today’s climate, I think it’s simply reality there’s diminished faith in the assurances of the present American government. People are asking like, should we trust any of this tech? In case they decide to